Chapter 3
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
PRINCIPLE
The Plan must integrate and coordinate the transportation
plan with the land use plan so that the roadway capacity improvements,
road safety improvements, mass transit development and alternative transportation
modes can be provided in the most cost effective and efficient manner feasible.
|
INTRODUCTION
The Circulation Element sets forth a comprehensive strategy for planning,
developing, and maintaining a County-wide transportation system, including
the creation of new transportation corridors, to serve existing and planned
land uses in El Dorado County.
An important objective of the Circulation Element is to recognize and
promote transportation modes and facilities of regional as well as local
significance in order to contribute to efforts to meet air quality standards.
State freeways and highways, aviation facilities, bicycle trail systems,
and transit services are examples of regional systems which have been incorporated
into this Circulation Element to aid in providing a framework for cooperative
planning and implementation of transportation services and facilities.
The Circulation System on which the General Plan is based is shown in a
map entitled General Plan Circulation Map, which is part of this General
Plan.
STATE AUTHORIZATION
The Circulation Element is required by Government Code Sections 65302
(b) and 65303.
The Circulation Element sets forth goals, objectives, and policies describing
the overall mobility program for the County. This approach is consistent
with the Government Code cited above as well as the California Department
of Transportation's (Caltrans) Advanced Transportation System Development
Program. Coordination between State and Local Transportation Planning is
a key to the success of Regional Transportation Plan.
The Government Code requires that the Circulation Element identify the
general location of existing and proposed major transportation routes,
terminals, and other local public facilities.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS
The Circulation Element, one of the eleven elements of the General Plan,
contains County policies on the development of transportation facilities
necessary to accommodate orderly growth of the County. The Circulation
Element identifies goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs
which affect the transportation system and provide guidance for future
transportation planning efforts. The Circulation Element has been correlated
with the Land Use Element as required by Government Code Section 65302,
Subdivision (b).
ORGANIZATION OF THE ELEMENT
This element will be implemented through the County's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). This element contains six major transportation system components.
These components consist of the following:
- Regional Highway System
- Public Transportation Systems
- Transportation Demand Management and Transportation Systems Management
- Non-motorized Transportation Systems
- Aviation
- Maintenance of Existing Facilities
All six components are closely related and play a vital role in the
County's attempt to achieve a balanced and sustainable transportation system.
Each component of this element identifies and briefly describes transportation
goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs which are intended
to serve as County-wide guidelines. This framework is designed to promote
a regional, cooperative transportation planning effort.
POLICY SECTION
REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
GOAL 3.1: REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
Provide a regional highway system which serves as the County-wide
roadway component of a balanced transportation system.
OBJECTIVE 3.1.1: COORDINATION WITH LAND USE MAP
Coordinate the Transportation System with the Land Use Plan to ensure
that new development is efficiently, safely, and conveniently accessed.
The Circulation Map adopted as a part of this element will show all existing
and planned arterial and collector roads. The transportation system will
be consistent with the Regional Highway System (RHS) and make the most
efficient use of the County's existing regional highway system.
- Policy 3.1.1.1
Roadway alignments and widths shall be consistent with the RHS. Standards
for reservation of right-of-way, intersection spacing, design, and location
of other points of access from subdivisions and other development shall
be included in the County Design and Improvements Standards Manual.
OBJECTIVE 3.1.2: ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS
Develop and enforce safe and efficient roadway design standards that
consider the variety of terrain and environmental conditions throughout
the County and minimize the degradation of environmental quality.
- Policy 3.1.2.1
The County shall adopt and enforce roadway design standards for use
in planning and constructing new or improved roadways. These standards
shall be included in the County Design and Improvements Standards Manual.
- Policy 3.1.2.2
A separation of at least 500 feet shall be provided between the terminus
of freeway off ramps and the nearest future intersection.
- Policy 3.1.2.3
Discretionary residential development shall be directed to areas where
the existing County road Level of Service is acceptable, or where infill
takes advantage of the existing circulation system and mitigates direct
impacts, or where the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) provides and has
funding for improvements.
GOAL 3.2: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
Provide a regional highway system which supports land use policies
of the County and cities.
OBJECTIVE 3.2.1: CONCURRENCY
Ensure that safe and efficient transportation and circulation facilities
are provided for concurrently with new development.
- Policy 3.2.1.1
Development proposals shall be reviewed to determine if significant
traffic impacts or reductions in Level of Service (LOS) per Policy 3.5.1.1
will occur to existing public roads as a result of the proposed project.
Project proponents shall be required to make necessary road improvements
or to pay a traffic impact mitigation fee (TIM), or some combination of
both, to accommodate increases in traffic caused by the proposed project.
- Policy 3.2.1.2
Development review shall consider the adequacy of public and private
roads for emergency vehicle access and for off-site traffic impacts. Inadequate
roads shall be improved through such measures as "area of benefit"
districts, fees, project approval conditions, assessment districts, or
other means.
- Policy 3.2.1.3
All developments may be required to either improve street frontage,
dedicate land for road right-of-way, provide road improvements, enter into
a street improvement agreement, pay fees, provide appropriate mitigation
for alternative transportation modes, or provide a combination of the above
as may be appropriate for the project.
- Policy 3.2.1.4
Where no improvement or other acceptable mitigation measures are proposed
to alleviate project-induced situations concurrent with development, land
development projects shall be denied.
- Policy 3.2.1.5
Before giving approval of any kind to a residential development project of five or more units or parcels of land, the County shall make a finding that the project complies with the policies added by this initiative. If this finding cannot be made, then the County shall not approve the project, or give final approval to a tentative subdivision map, until all these policy findings can be made, in order to protect the public’s health and safety as provided by state law to assure that safe and adequate roads are in place as such development occurs.
Note: This policy was added to the Circulation Element of the El Dorado County General Plan by initiative (a.k.a. Measure Y) of the people of El Dorado County on November 3, 1998. This policy may only be amended by a majority of County voters and shall remain in effect for ten years. Prior to expiration, it shall be placed on the ballot again to let the voters decide on a further ten-year extension.
OBJECTIVE 3.2.2: EQUITABLE COST DISTRIBUTION
Distribute the costs for necessary transportation improvements equitably
among those who will burden the system and who will benefit from the improvements.
- Policy 3.2.2.1
Improvements to the County roadway system will be funded partially
through traffic impact fees. Traffic impact fees are to be assessed on
new development as a requirement of obtaining a building permit or condition
of approval for parcel and subdivision maps or other discretionary applications.
To apportion transportation improvement costs to those more directly benefiting
from specific improvements, a system of geographic districts will be created
within the County. Each district will fund identified local transportation
improvements and its proportionate share of transportation infrastructure
which is of regional significance. The fees shall be computed using the
County's Capital Improvements Program (CIP) costs.
- Policy 3.2.2.2.
Funding of freeway interchanges shall be addressed through some combination
of the following potential mechanisms: special benefit assessment districts,
traffic impact fees, local sales tax, additional gas tax revenues from
local, State or Federal sources, or other creative financing process.
- Policy 3.2.2.3
The County shall continue to vigorously pursue funding from State and
Federal sources. Even if such funding should not be forthcoming, however,
the County is willing to accept the Levels of Service set forth in Policies
3.5.1.1 and 3.5.1.6.
- Policy 3.2.2.4
Developer-paid traffic impact fees shall fully pay for building all necessary road capacity improvements to fully offset and mitigate all direct and cumulative traffic impacts from new development upon any highways, arterial roads and their intersections during weekday, peak-hour periods in unincorporated areas of the County.
Note: This policy was added to the Circulation Element of the El Dorado County General Plan by initiative (a.k.a. Measure Y) of the people of El Dorado County on November 3, 1998. This policy may only be amended by a majority of County voters and shall remain in effect for ten years. Prior to expiration, it shall be placed on the ballot again to let the voters decide on a further ten-year extension.
- Policy 3.2.2.5
County tax revenues shall not be used in any way to pay for building road capacity improvements to offset traffic impacts from new development projects. Exceptions are allowed if County voters first give their approval.
Note: This policy was added to the Circulation Element of the El Dorado County General Plan by initiative (a.k.a. Measure Y) of the people of El Dorado County on November 3, 1998. This policy may only be amended by a majority of County voters and shall remain in effect for ten years. Prior to expiration, it shall be placed on the ballot again to let the voters decide on a further ten-year extension.
GOAL 3.3: SAFE AND EFFICIENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM
Provide for safe, convenient, and efficient movement of people and
goods through the regional highway system.
OBJECTIVE 3.3.1: IMPROVEMENT OF INTERCHANGES
Improve interchanges along U.S. Highway 50 and the roadway system in
the central urban corridor extending from the Sacramento/El Dorado County
Line to Camino.
- Policy 3.3.1.1
The County will continue to lead a comprehensive study, with the City
of Placerville and the State, to determine the most appropriate alignment
and design of State Route 49 and U.S. Highway 50. The preferred alternative
should improve circulation efficiency and minimize adverse impacts on the
environment, adjacent neighborhoods, downtown Placerville, and access to
South Lake Tahoe.
OBJECTIVE 3.3.2: MINIMIZE TRAFFIC IMPACTS ON STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM
Development projects directly or cumulatively affecting State highways
shall mitigate impacts, while recognizing level of service standards and
expectations for the future funding for highway improvements.
- Policy 3.3.2.1
El Dorado County recognizes that a substantial portion of the impacts
to the State highway system is due to external influences and are not within
the control of the County.
U. S. Highway 50 is a major thoroughfare to the Lake Tahoe Basin and
the State of Nevada, with the majority of trips being generated by the
Bay Area and Metropolitan Sacramento residents. El Dorado County also realizes
that major funding limitations exist within the State system. Legislative
policy allows additional growth and development within the County notwithstanding
the fact that until State or Federal money can be obtained to improve existing
conditions caused by external influences, new growth and development in
El Dorado County may exacerbate current congestion. Therefore, it shall
be the policy of the County to:
- Recognize the State highway system within the County as a part of the
County's Regional Highway System (RHS).
- Acknowledge that there is a long-term commitment to providing a safe
and efficient highway system.
- Encourage development in such a way as to minimize impacts to the RHS.
- Encourage the partnership between El Dorado County, the State, and
neighboring jurisdictions to solve State highway problems and funding limitations.
- Commit local monies, when available, in the partial funding of critical
State highway improvements. As a part of this commitment, the County shall
continue to pursue the use of development fees from private development
as a funding source.
- Acknowledge that adverse impacts to the State highway system resulting
from growth and development within the County will occur until adequate
funding is made available and improvements made through projects identified
in the adopted State Transportation Improvement Program.
- Monitor State activities in responding to the needs of the State system
within the County and actively pursue highway funding from State and Federal
sources.
GOAL 3.4: CONFORM TO ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
Provide a regional highway system which conforms to applicable environmental
quality standards to the extent possible.
OBJECTIVE 3.4.1: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY
Provide a regional highway system which, to the extent practical, is
compatible with the physical environment, enhances the environmental quality,
and conserves the natural resources of the County.
- Policy 3.4.1.1
Circulation facilities should be sited and designed in such a way that
avoids damage to the County's scenic and environmental resources to the
extent feasible. Roads should be planned and designed to minimize disruption
of soils, topography, vegetative cover, and wildlife habitat.
GOAL 3.5: ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE
Protect the public safety and welfare, reduce traffic congestion,
ensure acceptable level of service (LOS), provide for the movement of people
and goods, and conserve the functional integrity of the County-maintained
system.
OBJECTIVE 3.5.1: LEVEL OF SERVICE
Maintain LOS "E" on all County roads. The annual Capital
Improvement Program shall target those areas where LOS or safety standards
are not being met.
- Policy 3.5.1.1
The County shall adopt a roadway plan consistent with planned land
use and shall maintain an operating Level of Service of "E" or
better on all roadways, consistent with Objective 3.5.1. In addition, all
road segments projected in the roadway plan at the year 2015 to be operating
at LOS A, B, or C shall not be allowed to fall below LOS C and all road
segments at LOS D shall not fall below LOS D.
- Policy 3.5.1.2
The County shall prepare and update annually a list of proposed roadway
improvements that are needed to meet LOS "E" operations criteria.
A priority list of these projects shall be developed based on the ratio
of existing traffic levels to the desired service levels and in consideration
of public safety. The CIP shall emphasize capacity improvements to achieve
desired LOS in Community Regions and Rural Centers. In Rural Regions, the
CIP shall emphasize safety improvements.
- Policy 3.5.1.3
The County shall identify those roadways with existing or projected
capacity problems, prioritize them in terms of mitigation immediacy, and
develop programs for planning, financing, and constructing the needed improvements.
- Policy 3.5.1.4
Recognize that substandard road conditions exist in some rural areas
of the County and include feasible roadway, pedestrian, and bicyclist safety
improvements in the roadway improvement priority list where such projects
are feasible.
- Policy 3.5.1.5
The County shall adopt an access classification system and standards
for the management, regulation and control of vehicular ingress to and
egress from the County Maintained Highway system. All segments of the County
Maintained Highway system shall be assigned an access classification and
standard by the Board of Supervisors. The standards shall be the basis
for permitting access with regard to land use planning of adjacent properties
and the development of County construction projects.
- Policy 3.5.1.6
The County recognizes that Level of Service is a quantifiable factor
which measures the volume of vehicles to the capacity of the roadway at
a peak hour or peak period of traffic. The County recognizes that in developing
its circulation system it has to consider such factors as topographical
constraints, right-of-way considerations, and other jurisdictions' plans
for adjoining road systems. The County recognizes that in certain situations
it is not in the County's overall interest to develop a circulation system
which is designed for a peak hour or peak period of traffic. These situations
may include, but are not limited to, circumstances where the need to promote
overall economic development or the need to protect the County's rural
atmosphere, which is enhanced by two-lane roads, may outweigh the need
to provide a circulation system based upon a peak hour or peak period of
traffic. The County therefore recognizes that under certain circumstances
a Level of Service below that referenced in Policy 3.5.1.1 may be acceptable.
The County makes the finding that the road segments listed below are acceptable
at a lower Level of Service. While making this finding, the County will
attempt to improve these road segments to a higher Level of Service by
pursuing Goals 3.9 and 3.10 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
- Policy 3.5.1.6.1
Traffic from residential development projects of five or more units or parcels of land shall not result in, or worsen, Level of Service F (gridlock, stop-and-go) traffic congestion during weekday, peak-hour periods on any highway, road, interchange or intersection in the unincorporated areas of the County.
Note: This policy was added to the Circulation Element of the El Dorado County General Plan by initiative (a.k.a. Measure Y) of the people of El Dorado County on November 3, 1998. This policy may only be amended by a majority of County voters and shall remain in effect for ten years. Prior to expiration, it shall be placed on the ballot again to let the voters decide on a further ten-year extension.
- Policy 3.5.1.6.2
The County shall not add any additional segments of Highway 50, or any other roads, to the County’s list of roads that are allowed to operate at Level of Service F (gridlock) without first getting the voter’s approval.
Note: This policy was added to the Circulation Element of the El Dorado County General Plan by initiative (a.k.a. Measure Y) of the people of El Dorado County on November 3, 1998. This policy may only be amended by a majority of County voters and shall remain in effect for ten years. Prior to expiration, it shall be placed on the ballot again to let the voters decide on a further ten-year extension.
| GENERAL PLAN - LOS ANALYSIS |
| GENERAL PLAN 2015 |
| ROAD |
LOS |
V/C |
| Cambridge Road - Country Club Drive to Oxford Road |
F |
1 |
| Cameron Park Drive - Robin Lane to Coach Lane |
F |
1 |
| Missouri Flat Road - U.S. Highway 50 to Mother Lode Drive
|
F |
1 |
| Missouri Flat Road - Mother Lode Drive to China Garden Road
|
F |
1 |
| Pleasant Valley Road - El Dorado Road to State Route 49
(S) |
F |
1 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Canal Street to Junction of State Route
49 |
F |
1 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Junction of State Route 49 to Coloma Street
|
F |
2 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Coloma Street to Bedford Avenue |
F |
2 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Bedford Avenue to Begin Freeway |
F |
2 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Begin Freeway to Washington OH |
F |
1 |
| U.S. Highway 50 - Ice House Road to Echo Lake |
F |
1 |
| State Route 49 - Pacific/Sacramento Streets to new four
lane section |
F |
1 |
| State Route 49 - U.S. Highway 50 to State Route 193 (N)
|
F |
1 |
| State Route 49 - State Route 193 to County Line |
F |
2 |
| LEVEL OF SERVICE |
VOLUME/CAPACITY RANGE |
|
A
|
0.00 - 0.60
|
|
B |
0.61 - 0.70
|
|
C |
0.71 - 0.80
|
|
D |
0.81 - 0.90
|
|
E |
0.91 - 1.00
|
|
F |
>1.00
|
# of centerline miles at LOS F: 34.8
|
- Policy 3.5.1.7
In order to ensure that Level of Service below that identified in Policy
3.5.1.1 occurs only during peak periods and not during more extended periods,
the County will require project- specific traffic studies before granting
discretionary approvals for projects that will add substantial amounts
of traffic to the circulation system. This policy will apply even to projects
that do not require General Plan amendments. If such traffic studies show
that the projects in question will create, or significantly contribute
to, non-peak period traffic congestion below the Level of Service specified
in Policy 3.5.1.1, the County shall either condition such projects to eliminate
any such impacts or will deny such projects until such time as the circulation
system can absorb the traffic from the project without suffering non-peak
period traffic congestion below the Level of Service specified in Policy
3.5.1.1. Alternatively, the County may approve the projects in question
if such projects contribute their fair share of money or land toward planned
future transportation improvements that can feasibly be constructed within
a reasonably foreseeable time frame and will result in the ultimate avoidance
of non- peak period traffic congestion below the Level of Service specified
in Policy 3.5.1.1.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
GOAL 3.6: HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Serve the people of El Dorado County by encouraging and supporting
high quality public transportation services that are convenient, safe,
efficient, and effective.
OBJECTIVE 3.6.1: IMPLEMENT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Identify public transportation system improvements throughout the County
to meet the needs of both the general public and the public transportation
dependent.
- Policy 3.6.1.1
Utilize the existing El Dorado County Transit Authority (EDCTA) and
El Dorado County Transportation Commission's (EDCTC) public transportation
advisory committees to study and implement needed public transportation
improvements. This work will include participation in the EDCTC's Unmet
Needs Process.
OBJECTIVE 3.6.2: MULTI-MODAL INFORMATION AND SERVICE
Assist in providing multi-modal transportation service to all residents
of the County.
- Policy 3.6.2.1
The County should assist in the development of an intermodal facility
at a future rail transportation station that can accommodate bus, taxi,
bicycle, and other public/private transportation modes. The intermodal
facility should ideally be located in the El Dorado Hills area. A Park-N-Ride
lot should also be built as part of the intermodal facility.
GOAL 3.7: COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
Assist in the provision for commuter (peak hour) transportation
service.
OBJECTIVE 3.7.1: COMMUTER USAGE
Increase commuter usage and service.
- Policy 3.7.1.1
Coordinate with the El Dorado County Transit Authority in further developing
its existing commuter transportation services to downtown Sacramento as
well as major employment centers in the U.S. Highway 50 Corridor. This
strategy will provide El Dorado County residents with a quality transportation
alternative as well as create a ridership that would justify an investment
in a rail transportation system. These alternatives shall be assessed and
implemented through the County's Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
and Transportation System Management (TSM) programs.
OBJECTIVE 3.7.2: RAIL SERVICE
Plan for the extension of rail service from Sacramento into El Dorado
County.
- Policy 3.7.2.1
The County should continue to provide leadership in conjunction with
neighboring jurisdictions and transportation providers in both El Dorado
and Sacramento Counties to extend rail service to El Dorado County using
existing Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way where feasible.
- Policy 3.7.2.2
Investigate the possibility of a comprehensive rail financing program
for the unincorporated County to secure the necessary right-of-way, capital
improvements, maintenance, and operation costs through a public/private
partnership.
GOAL 3.8: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DEPENDENT
Respond to the transportation needs of the public transportation
dependent, such as senior citizens, youths, disabled persons, and those
of limited means.
OBJECTIVE 3.8.1: ASSISTANCE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DEPENDENT
Identify and support the implementation and development of assistance
to the public transportation dependent.
- Policy 3.8.1.1
The County shall work with the El Dorado County Transit Authority and
support the provision of paratransit services and facilities for elderly
and disabled residents, and those of limited means, which shall include
bus shelters, bus stops, and ramps at stops.
Continue
General Plan